Home > Business > ‘Entire Agreement’ Clause In Employment Contract Saves Employer

‘Entire Agreement’ Clause In Employment Contract Saves Employer

Employers should ensure their employment contracts state that they constitute the entire agreement between the parties, so that employees cannot bring legal claims if promises made during the recruitment process are not kept, a recent decision makes clear.

A new bank employee was told during the recruitment process that his discretionary bonus would be between 5 and 10 per cent. However, his letter of appointment:

• Made no mention of potential percentages or other sums payable by way of discretionary bonus

• Contained an ‘entire agreement’ clause saying the terms in the letter superseded any representations or promises made to him previously

For two years he was awarded a discretionary bonus of 1 per cent. He then learned that colleagues had been awarded 8 per cent and 11 per cent. He claimed his employer had breached his terms of employment by:

• Paying him only a 1 per cent bonus when he had been led to believe he would get more

• Failing to treat him comparably with other employees when awarding discretionary bonuses

The High Court ruled that the entire agreement clause did exactly what it said, and superseded any representations made during the employee’s recruitment process.

It also found that it was reasonable for the bonuses awarded to his colleagues to be higher as they had been employed for longer, and higher bonuses were an incentive not to look for another job.

Operative date

• Now


• Employers should ensure:

o No promises or representations are made when recruiting (or interviewing for promotion) unless they will be kept later
o Contracts of employment contain ‘entire agreement’ clauses saying the contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and that the employee should not rely on any promises or representations previously made
o They can justify apparent inconsistencies between employees when deciding on discretionary bonuses

Case law: Paturel v DB Services (UK) Ltd [2015] EWHC 3659

21 March 2016

Posted by:

Alex Cook

Request a Call Back

People frequently tell us that we’re approachable and offer great advice.

They also tell us most solicitors are hard to get hold of whereas we’re happy to listen. The reason for this is that we value long term relationships and we’re happy to speak with business people, to invest our time in understanding your business and whatever your concerns are. Only at that point can we understand whether we’re the right people to help you.

Related Blogs: