Construction Adjudication Solicitors

we move fast

98%

queries receive a response in under an hour

we Deliver results

£340m+

assets litigated over in the last 12 months

We get things done

500+

cases handled in the last 2 years

And we can back it up

500+

5* reviews on Google

If you’ve just received a notice of adjudication, you’re working against a clock that doesn’t pause for anything. Construction adjudication moves in days, not months, and the decision it produces can dictate your cashflow long before any final account is agreed.

We act for contractors, subcontractors, developers and employers on both sides of adjudication under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA), and we’re used to being instructed at short notice. If you want a no-cost, no-obligation initial conversation about where you stand, contact Helix Law. Our construction litigation team act nationally and would love to help you.

How Our Specialist Adjudication Solicitors Can Help 

Adjudication often rewards whoever is better prepared, not whoever has the stronger underlying case on paper. A referral that’s been rushed, or a response that misses the real point, can lose a dispute that should have been won. We work with both referring and responding parties, and the support we give looks different depending on which side of the notice you’re on.

Acting for the Referring Party

If you’re the one owed money or owed an answer on a contractual dispute, we help you build a referral that holds up under scrutiny: identifying the right dispute to crystallise, drafting a notice of adjudication that survives a jurisdictional challenge, and preparing a referral notice that gives the adjudicator everything needed to decide in your favour within the statutory timetable. Contractors and subcontractors come to us most often over unpaid interim applications, undervalued final accounts, and withheld retention, and we know how to frame those disputes so the commercial reality is in front of the adjudicator, not buried in technical argument.

Acting for the Responding Party

If you’ve received a notice of adjudication, your first job is to protect your position within days, not weeks. We assess the validity of the notice itself, advise on whether a jurisdictional challenge is realistic, and prepare a response that deals with both the substance of the claim and any procedural weaknesses in how it was brought. Employers and main contractors who come to us at this stage are usually trying to avoid paying out on a claim they believe is wrong, or trying to preserve set-off and counterclaim rights that a rushed response could lose. We move fast because the rules require it.

Beyond the Decision: Enforcement and Litigation

Adjudication produces a decision, not necessarily the end of the dispute. As litigation solicitors, we don’t stop at the 28-day decision: we advise on enforcing an adjudicator’s decision through the courts where a losing party won’t pay voluntarily, and on the separate question of whether the underlying dispute should be revisited in litigation or arbitration once adjudication has run its course. Many firms that handle adjudication can’t carry a client through enforcement proceedings or a fully litigated claim. We can, because that’s what we specialise in.

If you’re already partway through an adjudication and want a specialist second opinion on your position, we can review the papers and tell you honestly where you stand.

What Is Construction Adjudication?

Construction adjudication is a dispute resolution process under either section 108 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA) or the express terms of the contract that allows either party to a construction contract to refer a dispute to an independent adjudicator for a binding decision, usually within 28 days. It was introduced to stop payment disputes grinding projects to a halt while parties waited months or years for litigation or arbitration to run its course. Either party can start it at almost any point, and the other side cannot refuse to take part, although some contracts are excluded from the statutory right to adjudicate. .

The adjudicator’s decision is binding on an interim basis, meaning it has to be complied with straight away even if one party later challenges it through litigation or arbitration. In practice, most adjudication decisions are never revisited: the cost and delay of starting fresh proceedings over the same dispute is usually enough to make the adjudicator’s decision the final word commercially, even where it isn’t final legally.

Disputes Suited to Adjudication

Adjudication works best for disputes with a clear factual or contractual question at their centre:

  • Non-payment of an interim application
  • Disagreement over the value of a final account
  • Disputed retention release
  • Extension of time claims
  • Defects valuations

It’s less suited to disputes that turn on complex, multi-issue factual disagreement or that require extensive expert evidence, simply because the timetable doesn’t usually allow for it.

Looking for a consultation?
People frequently tell us that we’re approachable and offer great advice.
Contact

The Construction Adjudication Process Step by Step

Notice of Adjudication

The process starts with a notice of adjudication: a short document identifying the dispute, the parties, and the redress being sought. It has to be precise. A notice that’s too broad or too vague can be challenged on jurisdictional grounds before the dispute is even heard on its merits, which is why we treat drafting it as the single most important step in the whole process.

Appointment of the Adjudicator and Referral Notice

Once the notice is served, an adjudicator is appointed, usually within days, either by agreement or through a nominating body named in the contract. The referring party then serves a referral notice setting out the full case, including supporting documents and evidence, within seven days of the original notice. This is a tight turnaround, and it’s where thorough early preparation pays off.

Response and the Adjudicator’s Decision

The responding party typically has a short window, often as little as seven to fourteen days, to serve a full response addressing both the substance of the claim and any jurisdictional objections. The adjudicator then has 28 days from referral to issue a binding decision, extendable by agreement. Throughout, we advise on strategy and draft every submission so your position is as strong as the timetable allows.

Challenging Jurisdiction and Enforcing an Adjudicator’s Decision

A jurisdictional challenge might argue that:

  • the adjudicator was wrongly appointed
  • more than one dispute was improperly referred together
  • the contract itself doesn’t provide a right to adjudicate in the way claimed (or at all)

These arguments can succeed, but they’re narrow and courts scrutinise them closely, so we’re honest about the real prospects before advising you to raise one, rather than raising one simply to buy time.

Where a party refuses to comply with a decision, the usual route is enforcement through the Technology and Construction Court, which generally takes a robust pay now, argue later approach to adjudication decisions. We act in enforcement proceedings for parties on both sides: those seeking to enforce a decision in their favour, and those with a genuine, arguable basis to resist enforcement. Outcomes in litigation are never guaranteed, and we’ll always give you a candid assessment of your prospects rather than false reassurance.

Funding Construction Adjudication: Fixed Fees, CFA and DBA Options

We offer a range of funding arrangements for construction disputes, including fixed fees for defined stages of adjudication and, in some cases, Conditional Fee Arrangements (CFAs, commonly known as No Win No Fee) or Damages-Based Agreements (DBAs), where you pay an agreed percentage of what’s recovered instead of hourly fees. These arrangements are only available for some adjudication disputes, subject to case assessment and our funding criteria, and are typically limited to disputes valued over £5,000 with strong prospects of success. We’ll talk you through what’s realistic for your dispute at the outset, so there are no surprises on cost once you’ve instructed us.

Related Construction Law Services

Adjudication often sits alongside other construction disputes we handle regularly. If your dispute concerns an interim application or late payment, a disputed final account, or withheld retention, we can advise on the best route to recovery, whether that’s adjudication, direct negotiation or litigation. If you need advice before a dispute has crystallised, our construction contract advice service covers drafting and reviewing contracts to avoid disputes in the first place. You can see our full range of construction law services for more detail.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is Construction Adjudication and What Is Its Purpose?

Construction adjudication is a statutory or contractual process that lets either party to a construction contract refer a dispute to an independent adjudicator for a binding decision, usually within 28 days. Its purpose is to keep cashflow moving on projects by resolving payment and contractual disputes quickly, without waiting for lengthy litigation or arbitration. It is not available for every construction contract and you should seek legal advice if you are unsure whether you have the right to adjudicate. 

How Long Does Construction Adjudication Take?

Adjudication typically takes around six weeks from start to finish. The adjudicator must reach a decision within 28 days of the referral notice, extendable by 14 days with the referring party’s agreement or longer if both parties agree.

Do Both Parties Have to Agree to Adjudication?

No. In most cases, either party to a construction contract has a statutory right to refer a dispute to adjudication at any time, and the other party cannot refuse to take part. This is one of the key features that distinguishes adjudication from arbitration, which generally requires both parties’ agreement to that specific process. However, it is important to note that not every construction contract is covered by the statutory adjudication regime. 

Can I Sue My Builder for Breach of Contract?

Yes, if a builder has breached the terms of your contract, you can bring a claim for breach of contract through the courts, separately from or instead of adjudication. Which route makes more commercial sense depends on the value, complexity and urgency of your dispute, and we can advise on the best option for your circumstances.

Is an Adjudicator’s Decision Final?

An adjudicator’s decision is binding on an interim basis and must be complied with immediately, but it isn’t necessarily final. Either party can still refer the same dispute to litigation or arbitration for a final determination, though in practice many adjudication decisions are never revisited because of the cost of doing so.

What Should I Do if I’ve Received a Notice of Adjudication?

Act immediately. You typically have only days to assess the notice, consider any jurisdictional challenge, and prepare a response addressing the claim in full. Speak to a specialist construction solicitor as early as possible, since the statutory timetable doesn’t allow for delay once the process has started.

What Is the Difference Between Adjudication and Arbitration?

Adjudication is a fast, statutory process that either party can start without the other’s agreement, producing a decision that’s binding on an interim basis within around 28 days. Arbitration is a more formal, usually contractually agreed process that produces a final and binding award, but typically takes considerably longer and more closely resembles litigation in scope.

Who Pays the Adjudicator’s Fees and Legal Costs?

The adjudicator’s own fees are usually apportioned between the parties, often with the losing party bearing the larger share, depending on the adjudicator’s directions. Each party generally bears its own legal costs in adjudication, unlike litigation, since cost-shifting provisions are rarely available.

Acting Quickly in a Construction Adjudication Can Protect Your Commercial Position

Whether you’re referring a dispute or responding to a notice, the pace of adjudication means the preparation you do in the first few days often decides the outcome. 

We act for contractors, subcontractors, developers and employers across England and Wales from our base in Brighton, bringing specialist litigation experience to disputes that need a fast, commercially realistic response rather than a generalist’s first attempt. We won’t promise an outcome before we’ve seen your case, but we will give you an honest view of where you stand and what your options are. 

Contact Helix Law today for a no-cost, no-obligation initial conversation about your adjudication. Our specialist adjudication team have decades of experience in matters like yours, and we would love to help you.

Outstanding Reviews
from Real Business People

“Brilliant law firm, all staff extremely helpful. Jonathan and Ed do go the extra mile for you and are very honest about your prospects in a case. Thankyou for helping us and winning our case”
Google review
“Helix Law was able to recover monies owed for works completed, after waiting 12 months for various reasons we contacted Helix Law and they was able to offer expert advice on our options at hand. Within 3 months the money owed from an employer was paid to our business, special thanks to Edward Lamptey for his expert advise.”
Google review
Currently in the process of instructing them on a construction dispute. Jonathan Waters has been very patient and understanding despite my initial hesitation as to what to do. I know that I am in the right but sometimes one needs a helping hand for justice to be carried out.
Google review
Edward was very responsive and quick to return my phone calls and gave honest and sensible advice. Its always good to be able to speak to a qualified person on the phone quickly as well as emails.
Google review
“Helix provided contract assessment advice to my company to mitigate risk in an upcoming project – Jonathan’s advice was prompt, very clear and extremely useful to allow us to enter negotiations with our client. Helix were thorough in gathering our requirements and worked hard to understand the objective of our negotiations clearly, which was then reflected in their advice for risks in the immediate and longer-term. We will be using Helix again for contract advice and other services, their service is very professional and good value for the work that is produced.”
Google review

Frequently Asked Questions

Request a Call Back

Contact Details
Which best describes You?
Approximate value in dispute?
Are you enquiring regarding an adjudication?
Brief summary of the background
If you wish to upload a document referred to in the description please do so here. This is not mandatory and we will contact you to discuss what documents we need