Restrictive covenants can be imposed by a business wishing to protect their company or partnership when an employee leaves, particularly if they are moving to a direct competitor.
Restrictive covenants may be tested in court to determine whether they are enforceable by the employer or avoidable by the former employee.
There are other commercial reasons why a contract should include carefully drafted restrictive covenants. If you are purchasing a business, it is relatively routine to include a restrictive covenant to prevent the seller from setting up a new business in direct competition within a defined radius.
The creation of partnership agreements, joint venture agreements, sale and distribution agreements, agency agreements and exclusive supply and purchase contracts are just some examples where a restrictive covenant (and indeed often should) arise.
It is sensible to take expert advice when considering any commercial agreement in which a restrictive covenant would be beneficial, if not essential, to protect business interests.
Restrictive covenants are only enforceable if the clause does not extend beyond what is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest. Hence the need for expert consideration of both the restrictive covenant’s scope and exact wording.
Agreeing to a restrictive covenant needs strategic advice and may require expert negotiation.