Home > Business > Independent Review Of Swaps Mis-selling

Independent Review Of Swaps Mis-selling

Many banks have reached an agreement with the Financial Services Authority to voluntarily review any swaps/collars/caps sold to non-sophisticated customers in the last 12 years.

Further the banks must appoint an independent reviewer to see if their proposals for settlement are fair and reasonable.  Critically the banks have committed to make fair and reasonable redress to non-sophisticated customers who were sold structured collars.  If you think you may be affected by these issues there is extremely useful guidance published by the FSA in their document  ‘Interest rate hedging product questions’ .

If you are not happy with the result of the review then you may be able to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you are not happy with the Ombudsman’s decision then you may still pursue court action. This begs the question of if or when should you take legal advice. The agreed review process does not affect the application of the Limitation Act 1980 and some rights of action may become time barred during the period of review. If that is the case then those affected should take legal advice without delay.

If time is not an issue then in theory the agreed process may allow SME’s to recover fair and reasonable redress without the need for legal advice. It is not yet clear whether the process will deliver satisfactory outcomes and how long it will take for an SME to receive redress.

Posted by:

Jonathan Waters
Solicitor

Book A Call Back

People frequently tell us that we’re approachable and offer great advice.

They also tell us most solicitors are hard to get hold of whereas we’re happy to listen. The reason for this is that we value long term relationships and we’re happy to speak with business people, to invest our time in understanding your business and whatever your concerns are. Only at that point can we understand whether we’re the right people to help you.

Related Blogs: