Tenants planning to exercise break clauses must ensure they comply absolutely and precisely with any necessary conditions or risk the break being ineffective, a Scottish legal decision has confirmed.
A tenant of two business offices under two separate leases purported to exercise break clauses to bring both leases to an end by serving the appropriate notices. A break clause allows a tenant to get out of a lease at certain points specified in the lease, provided the tenant meets certain conditions.
Under the lease terms, the breaks could only be exercised if the tenant was not in breach of any obligations ‘at the date of service of such notice and/or the termination date’. The landlord claimed the breaks were ineffective because the tenant was in breach of its repairing obligations at the date it gave the break notices. The tenant admitted it had been in breach at that time but, by the termination date, had spent £1.3m and complied with the repairing obligations.
The court ruled that the tenant’s exercise of the break clauses was ineffective and the tenant continued to be liable for rent for the full terms of the leases.
• Tenants wishing to exercise break clauses must take specialist legal advice to see if and how they need to comply absolutely and precisely with any necessary conditions, or risk the break being ineffective.
Case ref: Arlington Business Parks GP Ltd v Scottish & Newcastle Ltd  CSOH 77
19 January 2015
Alex Cook initially trained as a Barrister (non-practicing) before cross-qualifying as a specialist commercial and property litigation solicitor. Prior to becoming joint owner of Helix Law in 2013, he was Head of Litigation and one of the youngest partners in the region in a large firm based in Eastbourne. Comfortable and experienced litigating against large international City firms, he has successfully resolved complex commercial and property disputes for clients ranging from large international businesses and property investors to individual business people. Alex is an accredited commercial mediator and he is increasingly asked to advise on contracts, risk, dispute avoidance and exit strategies. He also continues to develop and innovate our products, services and funding arrangements with the aim of making specialist litigation services more transparent and accessible.
This article is written to raise awareness of the issues it discusses and it may not be updated after it is first written, even if the law changes. It is not intended to be legal advice and cannot be relied on as such. Helix Law is not responsible or liable for any action taken or not taken as a result of this article. If you think the matters set out affect you and you wish to apply them to your particular circumstances then we are happy to give you free initial telephone advice.