Partners carrying on business in partnership should ensure there is a clear, written record of what they have agreed in relation to property used by the partnership, particularly when the partners change, following a recent ruling.
A husband and wife had built up a significant farming business as equal partners since 1986. In addition to the original farm, they also owned residential property, tenanted land and further freehold land. In 1997, one of their children was brought into the partnership. The farm, which had been an asset of the old partnership, was assumed to be an asset of the new partnership, and it was initially included in the new partnership’s accounts from 1998 until 2003. However, it was later removed from the accounts by a new accountant.
In 2016, a dispute arose as to whether the farm was an asset of the new partnership or not. The court ruled that it was not, and said:
• The fact that profits from an asset went into the accounts as new partnership profits did not mean the asset itself was necessarily partnership property, unless the asset was acquired using partnership profits
• Nor did the fact that the value of improvements, and the acquisition of other land, went into the partnership accounts during the same period (1998 to 2003) that the farm appeared in them, mean there was an implied agreement that the farm was an asset of the new partnership
• The wills of both husband and wife made clear that they considered they had retained personal ownership of the farm despite the new partnership, as they had each provided for part of it to be left to one of their daughters
• The accounts themselves were merely evidence, not proof, of ownership of the assets recorded in them. If they did not reflect what the partners agreed – and the court ruled that they did not – they should be disregarded
An asset is also partnership property if it was originally brought into the ‘partnership stock’. However, it was not clear in this case whether the farm had originally been brought into the partnership stock, so this test did not apply.
• Partners carrying on business in partnership should ensure there is a clear, written record of what they have agreed in relation to property used by the partnership, particularly when there is a change in partners
Case ref: Ham v Bell  EWHC 1791
Need to make tough HR Decisions? We can help.
Jonathan Waters is the founder of Helix Law. Before qualifying as a Solicitor he worked in industry and in investment banking for over a decade. He was also the Partner in charge of Commercial Litigation, Employment Law and Property Litigation at Stephen Rimmer LLP. Jonathan has wide experience of helping and advising businesses to avoid or to deal with commercial disputes and in particular construction disputes.
This article is written to raise awareness of the issues it discusses and it may not be updated after it is first written, even if the law changes. It is not intended to be legal advice and cannot be relied on as such. Helix Law is not responsible or liable for any action taken or not taken as a result of this article. If you think the matters set out affect you and you wish to apply them to your particular circumstances then we are happy to give you free initial telephone advice.