The votes of a prospective shareholder whose name had not yet been entered in his company’s register of shareholders have been held invalid by the Court of Appeal, because failure to enter his name meant he wasn’t yet a shareholder.
A shareholder of a company agreed to transfer his shares to a new owner. At a shareholders’ meeting the proposed new owner attended and voted as a shareholder in the company.
Under company law, a person is a shareholder in a company if he has agreed to become a shareholder, and his name is entered in the company’s register of members. In this case, his name had not yet been entered.
In a dispute over the validity of his vote, the court said he should not have attended and voted as he was not yet a shareholder, and his vote was invalid.
• A transferor may have completed a transfer form and handed it over, with his share certificate, to a proposed new owner. • The proposed new owner may have paid him, and then paid any stamp duty on the transaction. • The directors of the company may have approved the new owner as a prospective shareholder. • The company may have issued him with a share certificate.
But if his name has not yet been entered in the register of members he is not a shareholder yet.
In such circumstances, he may be able to require the shareholder whose name is still in the register to go to the meeting and vote in accordance with his instructions, although this depends on the terms of the agreement they made for the sale of the shares.
Recommendation Transferees and company officers should ensure a transfer of shares is entered in the company’s register of members as soon as possible after a valid, duly stamped share transfer form is presented to the company (or, in a larger company, the registrars who maintain its register of members for it) and the company’s articles governing transfers of shares have been complied with.
Case ref: Glencoe Developments Limited v Sneddon  CSOH Number 43
Jonathan Waters is the founder of Helix Law. Before qualifying as a Solicitor he worked in industry and in investment banking for over a decade. He was also the Partner in charge of Commercial Litigation, Employment Law and Property Litigation at Stephen Rimmer LLP. Jonathan has wide experience of helping and advising businesses to avoid or to deal with commercial disputes and in particular construction disputes.
This article is written to raise awareness of the issues it discusses and it may not be updated after it is first written, even if the law changes. It is not intended to be legal advice and cannot be relied on as such. Helix Law is not responsible or liable for any action taken or not taken as a result of this article. If you think the matters set out affect you and you wish to apply them to your particular circumstances then we are happy to give you free initial telephone advice.